Skip to content
Breaking News Desk Editorial

Shareholders Advocate for Elon Musk’s $56 Billion Compensation Package in Delaware Court

Abhishek Sharma
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
Published: Updated: 2 min read
AdvertisementAdvertisement

Alexandra Merz and Kristen Netten, among other shareholders, are rallying to reinstate Elon Musk‘s $56 billion compensation package, challenging a Delaware Court of Chancery ruling that deemed it void. They contend the court’s decision lacks financial justification and advocate for an extended vesting period to safeguard smaller shareholders. Musk appreciates their support. This development comes after a legal dispute questioning the independence of Tesla’s board in approving the package, with the plaintiff’s counsel seeking a $6 billion remedy. Musk is anticipated to appeal the decision.

Shareholder Alexandra Merz, in a letter on X, disputes the financial merit of the court’s decision to nullify Musk’s 2018 pay package. Merz contends that the anticipated invalidation lacks a solid basis for calculating potential financial gains. She has formally requested Tesla’s board to reinstate a comparable compensation package for the CEO. Criticizing the plaintiff counsel’s $6 billion stock compensation request, Merz urges the court to impose an extended vesting period to protect the interests of small shareholders, including herself.

Kristen Netten, another shareholder, called on fellow shareholders in a post on X, urging them to join the campaign. In her message, she requested others to express their reasons for opposing the disproportionate representation of shareholders in the ruling and criticized the proposed lawyer’s payment of 6 billion Tesla shares as an additional insult.

Elon Musk responded on Monday via X, expressing his gratitude to the shareholders for the campaign with a simple “Thanks :).”

Promoted on X with the hashtag #DelawareCourt81, a writing campaign has emerged following a significant ruling last month. Delaware Court of Chancery judge Kathaleen McCormick nullified Elon Musk’s 2018 pay package, valued at about $56 billion, citing insufficient independence of the board and deeming the process leading to the grant and its value as “unfair” to other shareholders. Musk is expected to appeal the decision to nullify his pay.

The plaintiff’s lawyers, who successfully challenged Musk’s pay, have approached the court, seeking Tesla shares worth $6 billion. They also requested immediate permission to sell these shares without a holding period. Approval for this request is pending McCormick’s decision.

🚀
⚡ Prime
Enjoy an Ad-Free Reading Experience
Plus 100+ screener conditions, historical signal analysis, DIY stock screening, FII/DII data & more.
Join Prime →
Abhishek Sharma
Founder & Editor-in-Chief

Abhishek Sharma

I’m Abhishek Sharma, an Advocate based in Delhi, entrepreneur, investor, and founder of BigBreakingWire. I am an enrolled Advocate with a strong interest in entrepreneurship, media, and technology. I founded BigBreakingWire, a digital news platform covering breaking news, business, financial markets, companies, and important developments in India and around the world. I also have a software company and take an active interest in technology, software, AI, digital products, and new business ideas. As an investor, I’m interested in discovering and investing in promising businesses and startups. I look for good ideas, strong founders, practical business models, and opportunities with long-term potential. I enjoy building businesses, learning about new industries, and connecting with people who are working on interesting ideas and opportunities. Advocate | Entrepreneur | Investor | Founder & Editor-in-Chief, BigBreakingWire

Last reviewed by Abhishek Sharma on August 31, 2026

Disclaimer: BigBreakingWire provides news and informational content for general educational purposes only. The information presented on this website does not constitute financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Readers should consult qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. BigBreakingWire, its authors, and editors are not responsible for any financial losses or damages arising from the use of information on this site.

Discussion

Share your take — react and comment in seconds, no login needed.

0 comments

Loading discussion…

Be civil — abusive or promotional comments get removed. No login required.

⚡ Upgrade to Prime
The Market Terminal for Serious Investors
🚫 Ad-Free Experience📊 100+ Screener Conditions🔬 Historical Signals📈 DIY Stock Screening🏦 FII/DII Data
Join BigBreakingWire Prime →